Sunday, January 29, 2006
Eternal Technologies (ETLT) More on the E-Sea clinic work
13,683 women were tested in 2005 [during only 2 months according to the separate press release]. ETLT was paid $5.00 each (total of $68,415). Imagine how much that would cost in the US. $100? This doesn't surprise me. When I was in India, medical costs there were unbelievably low (even by doctors trained in the West and better than most I might find in the US). It would be cheaper for me to fly to India and have a dental root canal and cap done by a top notch dentist than having it done down the street.
Eternal Technologies Group, Inc. (ETLT: OB) (“Eternal”) today announced that by the end of 2005, the last woman who was also the 13683rd one accepted mammary gland examination. More than 5% of the women who took the examination that year showed usual symptoms, and they were transferred to medical specialists for further examinations.
Being equipped with various mammary gland instrumentations and establishing examination stations has been the new profit model for the company. E-SEA has already signed agreement with China Women Primary Healthcare Fund International aiming to provide “China Women Health Project” with its products and to receive examination fees as a better return.
This business model starts with Longgang District, Shenzhen, China, where resides about one million women who have reached childbearing age. Most of them are working class women from all over the country who are low-paid, hard working, and rarely go for health examinations. E-SEA has signed a six-year agreement with local government to provide mammary gland examinations for women in this area. Local health authority pays RMB 40.00(U.S$5.00) for every examination conducted, and sets up health profile for every examined woman. As the government covers the examination fees, women are all willing to accept the examinations. The total examination fees of RMB 540,000.00 (U.S$68,000.00) received from 13,683 examined women is two-month revenue from only one station. Assume every instrumentation has a usage life of 5 years, this could raise RMB 500,000.00 revenue, which is 5 times the selling profit of a single instrumentation.
The corporation values more with the way to sell examination instrumentations through setting up examination stations as it avoids the risk of losing intellectual property rights and copyrights. Moreover, it prevents misdiagnoses from false operations of the instrumentations since all technicians have been properly trained.
In 2006, E-SEA is planning to establish 4 to 6 examination centres. Number of women to be examined will exceed 500,000, which will bring RMB 20 millions revenue for the corporate.
revisiting companies 8
revisiting companies 2
revisiting companies 3
revisiting companies 4
revisiting companies 5
revisiting companies 6
revisiting companies 7
IDIB (sec) Stock is up to 25.5 cents. Q3 Results: Cash is down, AR is up, loaned out money to related parties (partially offset by loans from RPs). Must have done an acquisition because goodwill is doubled. Current ratio fell below 1. More than half equity. Revenues are way down. But SG&A is down even more and they made an operating profit of $329K (loss in prior year). Net profit $196K ($534K for 9 months). 19.5 million shares on Nov 8, 2005. 6 million options on Dec 31, 2004. 4 million warrants (see below). Since no options were granted in 2003 or 2004, assume a totally diluted share count of 30 million shares. Net earnings for Q3 are $0.0065 per totally diluted share, which annualizes to 2.6 cents for a year and the stock might be worth 39 cents.
Cash flow from ops is very solid. Free cash flow is about $700K for 9 months. They invested $1.8 million of cash for Mentoring of America and HG Marketing (plus 2.5 million warrants and assumption of liabilities) and did a small amount of financing via notes payable. The drop in cash is due to the acquisition. The huge drop in SG&A is due to pushing all of this onto HG Marketing. Seems suspicious: seems like the costs haven't disappeared due to efficiency or any positive change, just who is charged for it. This kind of stuff often comes back to bite you in some way (or it's just plain fraud).
There are some complicated terms on the Mentoring of America deal involving escrowed shares and a monthly net income of $150K/month for 24 months.
Lots of other warrants issued for all sorts of stuff. About 1.5 million warrants. This is starting to look bogus. They keep issuing stock and buying stuff but revenues fall.
Also another acquisition of Hire Solutions acquired for 294K shares which could be "put" back to the company, which it was, for cash, but the cash is not due until Hire produces at least $100K of net income (which it hasn't yet).
I don't like what I see here. Too many shenanigans. Not enough business focus. Continue following for a while, but consider dropping it.
MHJ (sec) original post, Stock is down to $5.05 (from $5.50). I had figured it being worth $5.70.
Q2 Results: Revenues and gross profits are unchanged from the prior year. Operating income is more than doubled due to a huge drop in SG&A. They don't have the gain on a real estate sale which was in the prior year and added a one-time jump in profit. Net income is $551K. 5.8 million shares on Nov 14, 2005. 550K dilutive options. Unknown number of anti-dilutive options. Earned 8.7 cents diluted in Q3 (annualizes to 34.7 cents which would make the stock worth $5.21). Free cash flow matches earnings fairly well. Not much else going on besides operations and less than replacement capex.
Independent audit committee board member resigned with a replacement already selected (seems like it wasn't a surprise).
CEO bought 9.6% of the shares of a subsidiary.
MLR (sec) original post. Stock is up to $33.92 (from $18). Q3 Results: (comparing to Q2) Cash is up, AR is down, inventories down, current ratio is still very strong. Equity increased by over $5 million. Revenues are down slightly. Gross margins are higher resulting in higher gross profit. Net income is up somewhat. Earned 47 cents diluted (vs 45 cents). Cash flow from ops is strong (was very weak). Same for free cash flow.
New revolver with good terms. Australian military order is winding down (could have negative impact on the future?). Still, they have a "strong backlog". Negatively impacted by steel price increases.
HOOB (sec) Stock price is $48. The 10-K was released. 270K shares of stock on Dec 20, 2005. Gross profits are flat (pretty much every year). Net income jumped to $547K from $185K due to a drop in general expense and a drop in interest expense.
Medical business was dropped.
Cash flow is mainly generated by their Paramus, NJ real estate which is 100% leased out. Runs until 2012 when The Sports Authority lease expires (that building was acquired in 1971, 62K sq ft, acquired for $718K, $3.6 million capex, $3,6 million mortgage remaining). CompUSA lease expires in 2009 (that building was acquired in 1994, 31K sq vt, acquired for $2.6 million, no capex, no mortgage remaining).
Land is carried at $453K cost. I have no idea what it's worth.
Net rental income has been steady since at least 2001. Earnings per share starting in 2001: 58 cents, 58 cents, 74 cents, 68 cents, $2.03 diluted in 2005. $2.5 million equity.
Cash flow from ops has decreased each year, due largely to purchases of "trading assets" which seems like an investment activity.
Pension liability. Obligation is estimated at $3.2 million and has grown rapidly. The plan is mostly funded and the company has made regular steady contributions keeping it that way. Estimated return on assets is 7% (which is perhaps slightly high, but ok).
They've been buying and retiring treasury stock each year. They've been making approx $450K principal payments on mortgage.
$500K is probably a reasonable estimate of sutainable earnings. So the stock is probably worth $28 plus one-two-hundred-seventy-thousandth of the excess long term estimated value of the land (i.e. the non-bubble value).
HYDI (sec) Stock is up to $1.30 (from $1.15). Q3 Results: 4.6 million shares on Sept 30, 2005. AR is down. Fairly capital intensive. About half equity. Revenues down slightly across the board. Increased net loss. Negative cash flow from ops. Here's an 8-K full of excuses. They're working on new products. I'll wait and see what happens.
HWWI (sec) Stock is up to $1.00. They had lost 40% of their market when their implant business in the US was lost due to FDA changes. They're trying to get it back. I had figured it was worth 75 cents. Q3 Results: Revenues are up but gross profit is down. Expenses are down slightly. Net income is down to $118K (from $170K). 17.4 million shares on Halloween. When accounting for stock options granted, net income drops in half. Cash flow from ops is strong due to a drop in inventories. Will this business ever be predictable?
BUF previously MNRD (sec) Stock is at $1.85 (mostly unchanged). Q3 Results: 29 million shares on Nov 11, 2005. Cash is way up, but so is AR and inventories (huge expansion here), but not as much in PP&E. Current liabilities are way down. Balance sheet has gone from extremely weak to strong. Half equity (was large deficit). Revenue up somewhat. Larger operating loss. Huge net loss. Even greater burning of cash from ops. Huge influx of capital via preferred shares.
They merged with Technology Acquisition Corp.
DYSL (sec) Stock is at 87 cents. 10-K for period ending Sept 30, 2005. 3.8 million shares on Dec 12, 2005. 3.2 million options and warrants. High purity synthetic fused silica for optics. They stopped making glass and now just re-sell what others make. They acquired a business which doubled revenues. So I'd look out for low margins. Balance sheet is ok, but AR and inventories went way up (possibly from acquisition). Half equity. 30.6% gross margins, which seems good. 4% operating margins, which seems bad. 3.5% net margins, which is also low. Net income $173K, 2.5 cents per fully diluted share. Cash flow from ops is only $102K (AR and inventories). Free cash flow is close to zero. $768K cash paid for acquisition. Issued a bunch of preferred stock. Added some debt. The stock might be worth 37 cents.
DWVS (sec) Stock is up to 32 cents. Not much new except a resale of 7.5 million shares underlying a $600K convertable note. I had looked at the 10-Q issued on Oct 9, 2005 and decided the company was priced about right.
Saturday, January 28, 2006
revisiting companies 7
revisiting companies 2
revisiting companies 3
revisiting companies 4
revisiting companies 5
revisiting companies 6
MRCR (website) Industrial infrastructure products. Stock is at 90 cents. Ghost ship for a while. Q3 results: revenues and net income are both up. Income for 9 months was 19 cents per undiluted share (10 cents for 3 months). No balance sheet info. No cash flow info. The website doesn't have much more.
GENX (sec) Stock is at 22 cents, unchanged from the prior look at the 10-K and Q3. Nothing new.
JSDA (sec) Stock is way up to $6.28 from $5.32. New CFO. Nothing else new. prior
LWLL (sec) Stock is down to 19 cents from 27 cents. They completed financing of $1.5 million by dilution of something like 32 million shares.
NROM (sec) Stock is unchanged at about a dollar. They've released some strategy info, but nothing else. prior
NXUS (sec website) stock is down to $7.54 from $8.75. Q3 results: revenues were $10.4 million (huge growth from 2004). Gross margins were 36.8%. They made an operating profit! of $870K (and $7K for 9 months). Net loss of $348K. Balance sheet is very weak with current ratio less than 1/2 and less than 1/7 equity. A 10% increase in revenue would probably give them a net profit (revenue growth from Q2 to Q3 was less than 10%). Positive free cash flow for Q3 of about $900K. They repaid some debt. 170 million shares in 20-F. 18.4 million options outstanding. 77 million warrants outstanding. This appears to be subject to a 1-for-100 reverse stock split meaning the fully diluted share could would be 2.65 million shares. So Q3 free cash flow would be about 34 cents per fully diluted share, but this is probably not sustainable. I have no idea what the stock is worth, but it might be interesting at $5.00. Keep following it.
OHRI (sec) merged with Concentra Operating Corporation.
OISI (sec) Stock is way up to $1.90 from $1.26. A major shareholder sold a large number of shares, but otherwise no news.
PPDA (sec) Stock is way up to $1.40 from 94 cents. They got a $15 million loan and acquired Charge.com. The interest rate is 17%!!
PHST (sec) stock went up to $1.80 from $1.60. No news.
EBHC (sec) Eddie Bauer filed registration on Dec 15, 2005 to re-list, but then withdrew it on Jan 25, 2006. They may need to re-state financials. Then they will file again.
PACI (sec) Stock is unchanged at 80 cents. No news.
PASW (sec) Stock is up to 14 cents (from 11). No news.
OPTO (sec) Stock is up to $1.25 (from $1.07). Q3 results: 22 million shares on Dec 14. Cash is up, AR is down. Equity is up. Revenue is up slightly. Operating loss for the quarter. Free cash flow is good (positive). Lots of stock options.
OPCO (sec) Stock is up to 54 cents (from 42 cents). They acquired the assets of Pet Zone Products for 3 million shares plus 2.8 million warrants plus $465K plus a $250K 5-year loan, which is roughly costing $3.75 million. I can't tell much about Pet Zone.
PGRA (sec prior) Stock doubled to 2 cents. Previously they had been way late on filings. They filed a 10-K for the period ending Sept 30, 2004, a 10-Q for Dec 31, 2004, a 10-Q for March 31, 2005, and a 10-Q for June 30, 2005.
Looking at the June 30, 2005 10-Q, assets are mostly AR (unchanged from 10-K) and goodwill. PP&E is over 90% depreciated. Current ratio is less than 1. Not much equity. Revenues declined from the year earlier (both 3 and 9 months). Slight operating profit for 3 months,but mostly due to gain on lease termination. Operations generated good cash flow. Capex is nil. Paid off a lot of debt. Stock is not likely to be worth more than 5 cents, but that would be quite a gain.
PCYN (sec) Stock is down to 40 cents (from 55 cents). Q1 results: solid balance sheet. Mostly equity. Revenues up slightly. Very high gross margins. SG&A up even more. Income tax benefit. About 1 cent earnings diluted [actually less]. Free cash flow is also about 1 cent fully diluted (using capex or depreciation, both are low). Paid down related party debt. 8 million shares on Nov 8, 2005. 200K pfd shares (convertable 1for1 to common and with significant dividends in arrears), 300K options. 8.5 million fully diluted shares. Stock might be worth 60 cents. UPDATE Mar 17, 2006: More like it's worth about 35 cents.
NVMH (previously PDSV) (sec) Stock is at $1.50 on the ask. They dismissed the auditors. They're buying up 70% control of Dong Fang Zheng Yi Film & TV Communications Ltd. and Beijing Dong Fang Zheng Yi Film Investment Consulting Co. They produce popular mini-series in China. Total cost is $800K plus 6.2 million shares which translates to roughly $10 million. (prior 8-K)
According to audited financial statements, Dong Fang earned a net income of $661,593 on sales of $2,943,901 for the fiscal year 2004. According to unaudited figures provided by Dong Fang, for the first six months of 2005 the net income reached approximately $719,305 earned on sales totaling $3,279,102. (The figures for the first half of 2005 are subject to final audit and may vary in the final audited report.)This means they paid a P/E of about 21, which is too high for China.
Q3 2005 results: Balance sheet is extremely strong. $213K net cash out of assets of $260K. Net loss of $5K on revenues of $30K. Cash flow is good. $26K from ops. No capex. No financing. 8 million shares (before the acquisition above).
CKGT (sec) Stock is down to $1.15. Q3 Results: period ending Sept 30, 2005. 17 million shares on Oct 30, 2005. Balance sheet doesn't add up (cash and possibly other current assets are left out). But it looks like a strong balance sheet.
32% gross margins. 24% operating margins. No taxes. $100K foreign currency translation income (which is probably due to $6 million in cash that should be on the balance sheet but was left out). $436K earnings (without currency gain). Earned 2.5 cents per diluted share in 3 months.
Cash flow is terrible (negative) due to inventories and value added tax payables. Borrowed money from a related company. Very low capex relative to depreciation.
The stock might be worth $1.50. Not cheap enough.
INLM (sec) Stock is unchanged at 27 cents. Q3 results: AR increased. Membership lists intangible doubled (odd). Balance sheet reasonably strong. About half equity.
Revenues up slightly. Expenses up. Net income down to $27K (from $113K prior quarter). Earned 1/10 of a cent.
ISCB (sec) Stock is down to $47 (from $53). They acquired part of something through a complex deal. They issued "guidance" for 2006 which doesn't say much. The stock is still probably worth around $40.
IMMD website, Stock is up to 5 cents (from 4.5). Still no audited financials.
IAGX (sec) Stock is down to $2.05 (from $2.55). Q2 Results: AR is down, inventory is up, equity is up. Revenues are double prior year. 42% gross margins. Operating loss due to huge SG&A increase (supposedly non-recurring). Net loss larger than revenues. For 6 months, they generated $168K operating cash flow and sank $110K into informercials and stuff. The non-cash SG&A increase caused $254K cash for exercising stock options and warrants and they paid off $175K in debt to a related party. 11 million shares on Nov 21, 2005 with what looks like another 10 million (at least) in options and warrants. We could say that they have something like $500K earnings on 21 million shares for 6 months (not sure how accurate that is). That would correspond to 4.8 cents per share per year making the stock worth perhaps 71 cents. I might stop following after the dust settles.
IBTGF (sec) Stock sells for 83 cents. They filed their 20-F (Canada, Canadian dollars). Balance sheet is strong. Cash is up. Mostly equity. Revenues are up (as expected). Losses are even greater. Huge capex.
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
What can go wrong
The price is rising very fast and possibly too soon. It would be better if the price stayed low while Strathmore continued work on the various properties. A high price is bringing everyone out of the woodwork and into the mining business.
It seems like Strathmore will probably end up giving up a lot in order to monetize the uranium in the ground. I'm assuming that for every 2 pounds in the ground, it will cost them 1 just to do joint ventures. And the other pound will probably still have the cost of extraction. Considering the Church Rock results into this, I figure Strathmore has the equivalent of about 1 pound of uranium in the ground for each share.
The U3O8 price could have been artificially driven up too soon due to speculation and investment such as Uranium Participation. What happens if the rapid rise is due to short term accumulation and not to the long term imbalance in supply/demand?
E-Sea is not really related to what the company does.
There are some unusual "basic business" red flags.
It seems like the whole Inner Mongolia farm was a mistake.
China could go through some sort of revolution where they could be tempted to trample of the property rights of investors, especially us foreign investors. I'm hearing about a lot of protests and friction (the repeal of the agriculture tax is actually suspicious).
The market went wild about the new contract but might have missed two securities offerings (one for 1.2 million shares for contract service and sourcing by Expert Network, one for 800K shares for compensation) that for obvious reasons weren't publicized. This adds dilution.
The financing they got recently wasn't such a good deal for the company.
Contracts run out and need to be replaced with new contracts.
26 million shares were outstanding on Dec 27, 2005. This offering added another 14 million shares (2 million shares were already outstanding). The two offerings above added another 2 million. The results would be 42 million shares. They'll probably earn $12 million or 29 cents per share. Tack on a P/E of 15 and you get a share price of $4.35. But if you figure on more dilution in the future, with some various adjustments for totally vague factors, it would make a value of about $3.75 per share which includes some benefit of being invested in a desirable currency.
Their costs could go up at the end of the contracts due to higher than expected costs of maintenance and bug fixing.
They're capital intensive because they get paid over a long time period and the costs are more front loaded.
UPDATE next day:
OK, so what can go right?
Strathmore: You end up with 1 pound of U3O8 per share which (after accounting for the pound we already gave up to monetize the uranium) might cost another $20 to pull out of the ground. U3O8 currently has a spot price of $37 per pound (it remained the same this week) and will probably go up to say $40. So you end up with each share being worth US$20 ($40 minus $20) when they're selling for US$2. Ten-bagger.
ETLT: On a regular basis in the not-too-distant-future, they'll likely earn $4 million from their legacy operations, another $1.5 million from these clinics they plan to open up, another $1.5 million from the original E-Sea operations. The $37 million investment will likely end up earning them a routine $5 million per year. The result is $12 million in earnings per year (remembering this is as a reasonably competant business in an economy growing at around 10% per year). With 40 million shares, that results in earnings of 30 cents per share. Give them a P/E of 15 and the stock is worth $4.50 per share. Ten-bagger.
UPDATE Jan 29, 2006: In the ETLT quick valuation above, I only added $1.5 million in earnings for E-Sea when they had $1.8 million net earnings after taxes in the 6 months ended June 2005. Given the additional new business model, I'll use $5 million for E-Sea total. This ends up with $14 million in earnings per year, and a stock worth $5.25.
UPDATE Feb 1, 2006: Uranium spot prices ratcheted up 50 cents this week after taking a breather last week. The price is now $37.50. Based on my current estimates, changes in the spot price match 1-for-1 changes in the value of Strathmore. As usual, the industry news includes a few expansionary items and nothing indicating any contraction in long term demand.
UPDATE Feb 2, 2006: See this post for why the ETLT valuation was too high here. It's currently $3.00.
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Sunwin (SUWN) update
Due to issues with the auditors here, I would need more margin of safety for this company. Right now it's selling for what I'd consider to be a P/E of about 15. The company has been growing and they're putting a lot of investment into the business. But things can and do go wrong. I consider this to be only semi-audited, at best.Sunwin issued this press release which says nothing. I haven't seen anything to change my mind about Sunwin as an investment. It was selling for a P/E of about 15 and any increase in price would be based on assumptions about the future. And if anything, the deal with Alan Stone & Co made me think even less of them.
The stock has doubled since I looked at it on Jan 1, 2006. There are a lot of other Chinese stocks that I'd say were selling cheaper than Sunwin. I guess Sunwin got their $20,000 worth of visibility with Alan Stone & Co.
UPDATE Jan 30, 2006: Ok, so now the stock has more than tripled.
Eternal Technologies (ETLT) E-Sea update
The initial clinic is located in Shenzhen and has been open for two months. During this period, the Company netted approximately $68,000 (or over $400,000 on an annual basis). All of the fees for the Company's services are paid by local government agencies. The Company hopes to open four (4) to six (6) additional clinics during the current fiscal year which should produce an additional $2,000,000 -- $3,000,000 of revenue at very little cost.
With about 40 million shares outstanding, this would mean something along the lines of an additional 4 cents per share profit which we would expect to increase the value of the shares by about 60 cents while the shares are selling for less than 40 cents.
UPDATE Wed Jan 25, 2006: Looks like the market finally noticed. The price went up to 48 cents and fell back a bit.
Saturday, January 21, 2006
revisiting companies 6
revisiting companies 2
revisiting companies 3
revisiting companies 4
revisiting companies 5
Symbols being followed:
HEMA, HFIT, HNNA, MPAA, MPAD, MTWD, MHCO, SAUP, AVEE, GDVI, GNCI, GNCMB, GNSM, GLMA, PKX, HCAR, BKBO, BAWC, BWTL, BLLD, BURCA, BUKS, YIWA, SHFK, ADY, BABB, CBBT, QBID, CEEC, CITY, BGII, BONL, TELT, MRCR, GENX, JSDA, LWLL, NROM, NXUSF, OHRI, OISI, PPDA, PHST, PACI, PASW, OPTO, OPCO, PGRA, PCYN, PDSV, CKGT, INLM, ISCB, IMMD, IAGX, IBTGF, IDIB, MHJ, MLR, HOOB, HYDI, HWWI, MNRD, DYSL, HRBN, DWVS, DYHP, DTGLF, FAME, GACF, GBEL, GARM, DAAT, DAOU, DDSI, DEWY, DFNS, DNII, DSCI, DYNR, DRUG, EBHC, EPLN, ERIF, SMID, SPOP, SOTK, TBV, TLF, DXPE, GDVI, USOO, UMCI, LVLT, AORGB, APYM, ARKN, AMNF, ARTNB, VSYS, USTI, SUWN
HEMA (sec) Stock unchanged at around $1.70. No news. Prior.
HFIT (sec) Stock is up from around $2.00 to around $2.60. They're offering 6.6 million shares with a prospectus. They acquired healthCalc.net for $4 million and 847K shares of stock. Are they acquisition-happy? Prior.
HNNA (sec) Stock is up slightly. 10-K is out. 2.5 million shares. Their mutual funds have fairly crappy performance in my view although they beat the S&P 500. They had earned 93 cents in 9 months and earned another 27 cents in Q4 for a total of $1.20 diluted for the year. P/E of 15 would be a stock price of $18. Selling for $28.
MPAA (sec) Stock is about the same. Q3 results: Revenues up 18.8%. Gross margins increased. Operating income was down 10.5% due to G&A, they said it was due to SEC review of filings and SOX. Net income was down to 19 cents for Q3, 4 cents for 6 months. Cash flow from ops was terrible due to a huge increase in inventory, also inventory returned, and credit due customer.
MPAD (sec) Stock is up over 30%. Nothing new except a special dividend of 15 cents.
MTWD (sec) Stock is down somewhat. Q3 results: strong balance sheet. Gross margins 44% vs 55% in prior year. Operating expenses went up due to advertising, license and permits, rent, and some other stuff. Net income was fairly close to prior year, but less. Cash flow from ops improved, but still below earnings. Free cash flow is about half of earnings. Earnings were 1 cent. Stock is around $1.00. Overpriced.
MHCO (sec) Stock is up slightly.
MIOK (website) Stock is way up to $1.50 from 50 cents (it was over $2.00 for a while). Here was what I said about them: "they're making a cheap GPS system, which is good, but I fear that the big companies will duplicate what they're doing and do it even cheaper with large volume." Their most recent financial report is for June 30, 2005.
AVEE (sec) Stock is up. Nothing new.
GDVI (sec) Stock is down, but not enough, best ask is 7.4 cents. Probably worth only 8 cents. Q2 results are out. Revenues are way up. Net margin is very low. Earned a quarter of a cent for 6 months.
GNCMB (sec) Stock is unchanged with best ask at $11.00. They're investing $29 million in Alaska DigiTel. A board member is retiring with their son taking over the role. There's still a lot of stuff here that I'm not looking at, maybe waiting for a price drop.
GNSM (sec) Stock price is about the same. No news.
GLMA (sec) Stock price is down from $1.70 to $1.55. The 10-K is out. 2.2 million shares, 55K options outstanding. Current ratio is now > 1. Equity is up. Revenues are up. Gross margins are down (and only 15.8%). SG&A is about the same. Net margins are only 0.5%. Earnings are 4.5 cents totally diluted. Cash flow from ops is negative. Capex is large.
They acquired a marine boat mold company in mid 2005. Q4 earnings were lower than the average of Q1-Q3.
PKX (sec) Stock is about the same. I recall they had a bad quarter and some issues.
HCAR (sec) Stock is down somewhat, but not below the $1.20 value I had estimated. They're buying Nissan of Natick (Mass) for $2 million plus inventory, parts, and tools.
BKBO (sec) Stock is down and I've been looking at this one. The Toronto exchange will probably drop them, but it doesn't affect the pink sheets stock. Also, they're going to acquire Constant Data for $5 million cash and contingent payments of about half a million.
BAWC (sec) Stock is more or less up. The Q3 came out right after I last looked at it. Balance sheet is about the same but revenues are way down. Operating loss, but not as bad as last year. Free cash flow is about the same. Their cash flow statement doesn't seem to add up.
BWTL (sec) Stock jumped back up to $1.94 from around $1.50. Auditors left. Revenues are way up but that's due to increased gas prices (restaurant sales decreased 9%). Net margin is nearly zero for Q3 in both years. Cash flows look ok.
Net income for 9 months increased from $384K to $495K and that's only because of the increased gas price. The costs associated with the new travel center are probably merely the costs needed to stand still in market share. Earned 10.8 cents per diluted share for 9 months. Perhaps the stock is worth $2.10.
New travel center (Picacho, AZ) opened Jan 18, 2005. It will replace an existing travel center (which had negative 38% comps due to the new store). Negative impact even in Q3 ending Oct (depreciation). Merchandise sales: $253K. Gasoline sales: $491K.
BLLD (sec) Stock is down somewhat to $1.11. They're late filing the latest 10-Q, no good reason given. Bulldog Mexico started operations and has teamed up with a Mexican VAR and another Mexican company supplying various stuff (fleet communications, satellite mapping, microscopes, etc).
Primary among immediate opportunities for the Bulldog/Irosa partnership is the soon to be passed Mexican Customs regulation requiring electronic cargo container security seals and GPS tracking devices on the border crossing points (Tijuana to Matamoros), the logistic corridor (Manzanillo-Kansas City ) and for the PITEX Program (temporary imports program for exports). Both a security and a customs revenue tracking mandate, this initiative calls for a dual purpose device that is affordable for transportation companies while providing complete transparency of cargo status and manifest integrity. To date, the patented Bulldog RoadBOSS™ GTS and YardBOSS™ are the only devices that are able to offer this functionality.New prospectus. for 6.4 million shares of stock. These are being resold, not new shares (except for some warrants associated with an Aug 29 private placement and April 13, 2004 private placement). 24 million shares outstanding on Nov 1, 2005. This appears to be the same as the prospectus of Oct 12, 2005 prior.
BURCA (website) Stock is down slightly to $22.25. No news since the Q3 results in the prior revisit. Still not cheap enough.
BUKS (sec) Stock is way up to 51 cents from 34 cents (which was down from 50 cents). These are the Learjet upgraders. Their 10-Q is out for the quarter ending Halloween and the proxy is out. Condensed results show revenues and profits down.
YIWA (sec) Stock has tanked to 8 cents on the ask from 28 cents. They never released Q3 results, their website has expired, there's no news. This is very troubling. I want to continue following it just to see what happens.
SHFK (sec website) Stock is up a bit to $7.00. They're going dark. Nothing new, next expected statement should be the annual report on their website. Wait and see what that looks like.
ADY (sec) Stock nearly doubled to $12. It took off in early January when the company issued a press release giving financial expectations for the year of at least 70 cents earnings per share. And they expect 2006 to be nearly double that. They're hyping the stock now on US television. I suspect the stock will never be cheap again, but who knows.
BABB (sec) Stock is down to $1.09. No news.
CBBT (sec) Stock is way up to $10.00 from $6.50. The 10-K came out. They obviously added capital from the prior year, but they also had significant earnings. Revenues are way up. They earned 32 cents diluted for the year (11 cents in Q4), but cash flow from ops is way negative due to AR. So a lot of those revenues are financed sales. Also enormous capex (10 times depreciation) which is not surprising since they're doing serious investment now.
QBID and now for comic relief. The stock continues its long downward plunge. The best ask is now 1/50 of a cent. There are 1.3 billion shares outstanding so the market cap is around a quarter of a million dollars. But don't get too excited; these people do not seem the least bit business savvy. Consider this press release:
Triangle Multi-Media (Pink Sheets:QBID) announced today that, in accordance with SAAG, Triangle Multi-Media will start accounting for Q Television Network as a 100% wholly owned subsidiary. This means Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders own one hundred percent of Q Television Network's (QTN) total asset base, including its contracts with Time Warner, Cox Communications, RCN and Australia's SelecTV, as well as advertising revenue, tangible property, subscriber base and an independent audited film library worth over several hundred million dollars.... QTN will be accounted for as a wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media in accordance with SAAG.SAAG! Haha. I knew they'd continue to provide comic relief. They corrected it later.
BURBANK, Calif., Jan 10, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- First graph, first sentence and second graph, second sentence of release should read xxx in accordance with GAAP (sted in accordance with SAAG).
The corrected release reads:
[rest of press release follows]
Keep making mistakes and correcting them. You're only helping out Warren Buffett (Berkshire now owns Business Wire).
And once again, they only sound stupid when they claim the film library is worth "several hundred million dollars". Any reasonable financial person would know that to make that sort of claim about something fairly intangible like a film library, you need something to back it up with, especially when it's an outrageously high number like that. Consider this: "several hundred million dollars" would be at least $300 million, right? So it would need to generate a net revenue stream of at least 4% of that, or $12 million per year. Something tells me they aren't pulling in $12 million per year from their films.
Ok, so Triangle Multi-Media issued this distress release:
Migrating its programming service from major urban markets to middle America, Q Television Network (Pink Sheets:QBID) has announced its launch on the Time Warner Cable Nebraska system, servicing the Lincoln area and the seven colleges and universities in the marketplace. Lincoln area cable subscribers will be able to sign on for QTN's live, original, gay and lesbian programming as a 24/7 premium network, carried on channel 392 effective immediately, for a monthly fee of $7.95.Ok, so let's say 3% of Lincoln, Nebraskans identify with the gay and lesbian scene. We'll even bump that up to 5% considering it's not too far from Brokeback Mountain, Wyoming. Lincoln has a population of 226K and since we're talking about the greater metro area, we'll bump that up to 350K. So the total available market (TAM) is 1,500 people. Of course we need to assume some of those people are married, I mean in civil unions of some sort, so we'll say 1,100 households to be optimistic. I seriously doubt they'll get more than 25% of those households to sign up, which is still being optimistic. This means they might have revenues of $2,186/month before subtracting off whatever the cable company takes. So I'd be surprised if this is even $1,000/month of revenues, which is nothing when you're sitting on a film library worth "several hundred million dollars". But wait, in the press release, they claim:
The addition of Lincoln will extend QTN's reach by approximately 3 million digital cable households.The entire population of Nebraska is only about half that much, and that's assuming each person is a household and has cable. They probably meant to say to 3 million, since they have Houston, parts of NY and NJ, and Maine.
Let's do the math for 3 million households. Realistic TAM is about 100,000 households. And now we need to be fairly conservative, so we'll say that about 10% of those households sign up for QTN and that QBID makes about $4 per subscriber. That's $40,000/month or about half a million dollars per year in revenue.
CEEC (sec) Stock is unchanged at 25 cents. CEO resigned but will act as advisor to the company.
BGII (website) Stock is up to 66 cents (from 40 cents). Q4 results: Revenues are double last year's revenues. Earnings are expected at 8 cents undiluted. Remember that these people had an SEC investigation in 2002. They had their gambling machines seized in 2001 and 2002.
AMEN (sec) Stock is down slightly. Q3 results: Balance sheet is very strong. They started getting retail electricity revenues. They have an operating loss for the quarter and for the year.
BONL (website) Q2 results: A lot more cash on the balance sheet. AR and inventory are higher. Current ratio is still insanely high. Nearly all equity.
Revenues are up significantly. For 6 months: Gross margins are 74% (actually down from 76%). 23% operating margin (up from 20% due to a 36% increase in revenue from prior year). Net margin 17% (up from 16%). 9 cents diluted for 6 months. Share count unchanged.
No cash flow statement.
Unit sales volume has seen a 79% increase due to an increased volume of lower priced units sold in the first half of the year compared to last year in same six month period.
Foreign sales are continuing to be strong at 38.5% of unit volume.
"Our subsidiary, Bonal Technologies is continuing to grow in both US and foreign sales. We are happy with our results," said A. George Hebel, III, chairman of Bonal International. "We're also pleased to report that our new products Black Magic(R), for distortion control, and Pulse Puddle Arc Welding(R) are continuing to represent a good portion of our growth."
TELT (sec) Stock is up to 58 cents from 48 cents. No news.
Dictionary of Extrafinancial Terms
cash flow three card monte (CF3CM): shifting portions of operations related receivables into long term receivables, notes receivable, floor-plan notes, leases receivable, or franchises receivable AND moving changes in those accounts into cash flows from investing rather than cash flows from operations. See this post for details.
diff output: diff is a utility which compares two files for differences, which is an important thing to do when a company releases an amended financial statement such as a 10-K/A. Using the -u option, the first character of each line determines what the line contains. A line starting with @ (actually two of them) specifies the locations in each of the files, don't worry about this too much except that each time you see one, you're looking at a new place in the two files. A line starting with "-" shows something that exists in the original file but not in the updated one. Likewise, a line starting with "+" shows something in the updated file and not in the original. A line starting with a space " " is just a reference point and is the same in both files (don't be fooled by these, thinking that it's part of the difference).
Example (the first two lines below specify the files being compared):
--- 10-K 2006-03-25 09:29:00 -0500In this case, the only two changes are that they changed "we are lying to you" to say "we are not lying to you" which is an important change, and that it's a 10-K/A now instead of a 10-K which is not an important change (it's obviously going to be changed).
+++ 10-K/A 2006-03-22 08:15:00 0500
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
Cheatem and Run, Inc.
-10K issued by cheatem-and-run-dot-com
-we are lying to you
+10K/A issued by cheatem-and-run-dot-com
+we are not lying to you
diluted shares: number of diluted shares claimed by the company.
distress release: a press release containing information so underwhelming that it's actually bad news. Example: "XYZ Corporation announced that most of its employees showed up for work today."
Fardo principle: states that all non-financial management believes they're doing better than the accounts show. Therefore, if this management is allowed to use their judgement in reporting results, it will nearly always be overly optimistic. [named after the esteemed Elias Fardo who apparently developed the principle]
fully diluted shares: number of outstanding shares plus the total number of outstanding warrants and options.
ghost pirates: a "company" without viable operations which tries to acquire operations to have an excuse to draw a salary from the corporation, typically churning through multiple business failures.
ghost ship: a company without clear direction and leadership, usually coasting off prior success.
GRAAP: a hypothetical accounting system similar to GAAP, but much more flexible and open to the opinions of management. GRAAP based results are oddly always far superior to the same results stated using GAAP due to the Fardo effect: "...at the heart of every non-financial management person is the quiet belief that they are really doing much better than the accounts show." -- Elias Fardo --
local royalty: people who have lived in a small geographic area for a long time and have become highly respected within the community. Conflict can arise when global competition enters the geographic area since it's almost always more effective/productive/responsive/etc. than the locals. The local royalty has the advantage of having a strong reputation (built over a long time period) to protect, making them often more trustworthy. They also usually understand the local market better.
mousetrap: a company which is betting its future on some gimmick, usually patented. These are rarely successful because the business leaders are too focused on their fancy solution and not on the customers' problems.
plate-o-shrimp: an unrecognized cause of two otherwise coincidental events, often where those two events are incorrectly assigned some direct cause-and-effect relationship. The name comes from the movie Repo Man where the character Miller says, "suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either. It's all part of a cosmic unconciousness." Later in the movie you see a sign in the background advertising a "Plate o' Shrimp" for $2.95 (which one could assume caused a coincidence involving a plate of shrimp). When confronted with a surprising coincidence or an unlikely cause-and-effect relationship, it's important to always look for the missing "plate o' shrimp" (i.e. unrecognized common cause of both events).
Example: I pride myself on having solved the "It's always Thursday" syndrome (mostly just because I recognized it as a plate-o-shrimp situation). Several co-workers years ago had this humorous theory that it's always Thursday because whenever someone would ask "What day is it?" and the answer would always be "Thursday!" Here's the plate-o-shrimp: On Mondays or Fridays you'll never ask what day it is because it will be obvious. Tuesday you still pretty much know what day it is. By Wednesday, you're starting to lose track. And by Thursday, you do lose track and you have to ask and the answer is: Thursday! This is obvious if you change "It's always Thursday" to "I'm always awake and never sleeping." [Is this related to the Zen assertion that people are more self-aware when their thought patterns follow unusual routes?]
serial acquirer: a company which compulsively buys other companies for no good reason.
totally diluted shares: total expected number of diluted shares some time in the distant future when I'd be selling the stock at full price.
underpants gnomes: a business with a compeletely flawed business plan without any clear idea of how to make a profit (see here for details).
Friday, January 20, 2006
That means the LA Times, for example, might be 75% about what's going on within the Los Angeles metro area, 20% about big things going on in California, and 5% about even bigger things going on in the Western US (mostly in how these things affect Los Angeles).
So if there's an earthquake in Central California, the LA Times might have a detailed article about an aquaduct feeding into LA being damaged but not about the earthquake itself. It would have links to (yes, this would mostly be online and not printed paper) the local news sites where the earthquake struck as well as geological news sites which cover earthquakes in general. It might link into Washington DC news sites that cover whether the president will declare the area a disaster area and provide funding.
I'd expect all news sources of the future to have two parts.
- Gathering of news in their own small area of expertise (local geography and/or narrow subject).
- Gathering all the needed links to relevant sources for each news item.
Here's a great article which talks in excellent pragmatic detail about how to transform local newspapers and why.
So I believe the best plan of investment is to watch for any well-run news organizations which make these changes aggressively.
Monday, January 16, 2006
The Columbian Exposition of 1893
In addition, the populace of the west got its first glimpse into the culture of Japan, which had been completely closed to the west until just 40 years earlier (the Tokugawa Shogunate had closed Japan to the West for 200 years). Who would have predicted where Japan would be 100 years later? or 50 years later, for that matter. Sadly, the Japanese Phoenix House was burned by "vandals" during WWII. At the exposition, it was pretty clear where Germany was heading: there were an insane number of giant Krupp cannons.
Most important of all... it actually made a profit, although some people didn't think that was a noble cause.
The object of the Fair is now frankly proclaimed to be that of making as much money for its stockholders as possible. Amusement, of cheap and even vulgar sorts, is being substituted for education, because most people prefer being amused to being instructed.Lots of respectable people didn't like the midway. I wonder what they would have thought about the Internet?
UPDATE in response to no one and nothing in particular:
At a time when it seems like just about everyone is apologizing for the crimes of Western Civilization, I feel like I'm its only true believer. I will not apologize for something that has greatly lengthened the lives of, improved the efficiency in the use of resources by, improved the living standards of, increased the knowledge and education of, increased the productivity of, increased the choices for, increased the justice experienced by all of those who participate in it: If you take every single person born into Western Civilization in the last 100 years (or even anyone captured into it or adopting it voluntarily) and match them up with a equal sized group outside of Western Civilization from any single time period (i.e. no cherry picking), it will be extremely easy to match them so that every single "civilian" has a life preferable to the matching non-"civilian".
Along with that, I believe it's important that we continuously improve the world we live in. Not by arrogantly tearing down what others before us have built, but by adding improvements when we see something that can be added. As someone said, civilizations die by suicide, not by murder.
ANOTHER UPDATE: A Wall Street Journal editorial (registration probably required) looks at a poll within various countries seeking how many people agree with the statement, "the free enterprise system and free market economy is the best system on which to base the future of the world." Who's at the top of the list? China with 74% (the US is at 71%). Even after all that horrible communism (or maybe because of it), the Chinese still strongly believe in free markets. The Wall Street Journal beleives it's because of the Chinese culture.
...for a culture where common New Year's greetings include "I wish you happiness and many riches" and "may you make great profits," should we be surprised? (Most Hong Kong residents spend New Year's politely distributing packets of crisp new cash to their friends and family, ramming the message home.)Of course then there's Europe where France was around 50% and the others in Europe apparently aren't much different. I'm wondering if we should have let Western Europe fall to communism during the Cold War to give them an appreciation for free markets and freedom in general. Right now they seem to have too much longing for the nanny state and powerful central governments telling them what to do. Oh well. They won't stop Globalism's great march forward based on the principles in Adam Smith's little red book. Capitalists of the World, Unite! :-)
ETLT, World's longest tax ends
The Chinese Agriculture Tax, which predates the founding of the Roman Empire by several hundred years, finally ended a couple of weeks ago. This just shows how long it can take to get rid of a tax once it's on the books: 2,600 years. And you just know there probably wasn't even a single year when that tax wasn't enforced.
This is what ETLT had to say about it:
The tax holiday which had been granted to the Company expired on December 31, 2005. This repeal will in essence, continue the tax holiday on the Company's agricultural operations and increase its return on the developing project in Hunan Province. It is estimated that the repeal of the tax will save the Company US$3,000,000 to US$3,500,000 during the development stage of the Hunan project alone, thereby reducing the US$37,000,000 dollar cost of the development by a corresponding amount.My first reaction was that they claimed the tax holiday expired in 2008, not 2005. In their Q3 10-Q statement filed on 11/15/2005, they say, "The Company has benefited from this holiday since inception and anticipates that the holiday will extend through July 2008."
My next reaction was, "What the hell is this Hunan project?"
It turns out that the Hunan project includes the various projects that they've been announcing. I went back over the various news items on the website and it's pretty much all stuff I've already known about, except for the reindeer experimentation thing (Sika, which we call reindeer, are originally from northeast Asia).
Saturday, January 14, 2006
More raw sewage
UPDA (sec), real estate investment holding company focusing on low and non-performing assets. CEO owns 54.5% of the stock. Balance sheet is very weak, current ratio is less than 1/3. Shareholder deficit is more than twice the value of the assets. Losing money.
UPWT (sec), stopped reporting in 2002, but then issued a bunch of 8-K statements about an agreement to install at least 5,000 "Ice Island Machines" in liquor stores, grocery stores, etc. Their most recent 10-Q for June 30, 2000 shows assets of $1,000 and liabilities of $754K, no revenues, negative cash flow from ops.
URNZ (sec), a mine with no revenue.
USCA (sec), a mine with no revenue.
USGL (sec), a mine.
USPL (sec), lumber made from recyclable material. Last 10-K was filed for year 2002. Nothing but huge losses and negative cash flow.
USPO (sec), ghost ship for a while, went into various unrelated businesses. Smart payphones. 511 payphones in 2 states. $1.9 million invested in telecom equipment which has been depreciated down to $390K. Total assets are only $471K. Liabilities are $970K. Massive money loser.
USWI (sec), Wireless company that went bankrupt on March 26, 2004.
UWNK (sec), entertainment software for touch screen video game terminals and amusement vending machines. Current ratio is slightly worse than 1. Almost no equity. Huge money loser.
AORGB (sec), Allen Organ Company, musical instruments (mostly church organs, good niche), datacom, electronic assemblies, and audio equipment.
Revenues have been reasonably steady since 2000. They lost money in 2001, but made money in 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2004. Average earnings per diluted share for 2000-2004 is $1.40. Dividends have been steady at 56 cents.
Current ratio is 5.3 and was 6.5 in 2003. Strong balance sheet. 7% operating margin, but was only 1.5% in 2003 (was around 6% in 2002). They have a pension liability (assumptions are pretty good, 7% expected long term return on investments going back to 2002). Very little dilution. Capex matches depreciation. Free cash flow has been well above earnings for the last 3 years.
I figure the stock is probably going to be worth at least $25. It's selling for $57. Not surprising; it seems like a great business. I like this company from what I see.
AMEL (sec), oil and gas, went bankrupt in 2002. Get this, they lost money in 2005.
AHIZQ (sec), bankruptcy.
ACTC (sec), market and sell Kachina dolls in the $6,000 to $8,000 price range. Carved wood doll from the Hopi Indians. Most competition is for dolls in the $300 price range.
Weak balance sheet. Current ratio less than 1 and current assets are almost entirely inventory. Small shareholder deficit. This is listed as a development stage company. Revenues for 2004 are only $2,500 (with gross profits of $500). Revenues for 2003 are only $3,200 (with only $700 gross profit). So I thought each doll was at least $6,000. Did they just sell like an arm or a leg? SG&A is $53K. Huge money loser.
ADDI (sec), patented urine specimen rapid drug screening test. Current ratio is about 1/2. Huge shareholder deficit. Very low revenues and they're declining. Huge money loser.
ADTR (sec), video game console distributor. Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft. 11% gross margins (which seems even a bit high). Net margins were (.7)% in 2004 and 1.2% in 2003. What value do these guys add? Seems like nothing.
WGAN (sec), last 10-K was for 2002.
WTCH (sec), last 10-K was for 2002.
WTER (sec), large scale water purification equipment. CEO owns 16% of the stock. Hideous financials.
WTMK (sec), oil and gas company, Colorado.
WYDY (sec), "Whos Your Daddy Inc" sports fan clothing and stupid gifts, previously Snocone, previously Riskebiz, etc. Assets consist of $402K of "Technology", $5K of prepaid expenses, and $1,455 in cash. Current liabilities are $110K. No revenue....
RSVP (sec), educational software. Balance sheet is fair, but almost no equity. Gigantic money loser.
Thursday, January 12, 2006
AMTEX machinery (AMXY)
So far, there's no quote, no bid, no ask, no nuthin. Perhaps tomorrow.
Their financial statement shows that they actually made money in the first 9 months of 2005. They're incorporated in Oklahoma in 2000. Shamee Gafur is the CEO... and CFO.
Shameem A. Gafur has over 21 years of extensive experience in both international trading & textile manufacturing. Mr. Gafur is the founder of Arman Dyeing and Finishing Mills established in 1983. Under Mr. Gafur's guidance Arman Dyeing became one of the top ten Dyeing and Finishing Mills in Bangladesh in 1987. Mr. Gafur graduated form [sic] California State University Northridge (CSUN) School of Business Administration & Economics located in Northridge, CA. Mr. Gafur owns 2,767,500 shares of the Company.Asma Begum is a director owning 2,767,500 shares of the Company. "Shee [sic] is very well respected in the pre-owned textile industry. Mrs. Begum brings her management experience along with her leadership capabilities."
Since the document lists Shameem Gafur and "Asthma" [sic] Begum as Control Persons, I would have assumed they're related, but "There are no relationships with any director or shareholder of the Issuer."
Kamrul Hassan is a director owning 307,500 shares. "He has put together more than ten composite textile projects established in Bangladesh and India." Apparently he's located in Bangladesh.
Tazul I. Dhali is a director owning 307,500 shares. "He is an industry consultant and advisor for several multinational textile mills in Bangladesh." He's currently Managing Director for H. H. Textile Mills Ltd. which is "one of the six largest textile mills in Bangladesh."
Also L. Peterson is listed as a Chief Advisor with "over 30 years of executive business management experience. He was a former IT consultant to Yahoo, IBM, Sun Microsystems, Hitachi." etc. etc.
The 15c2-11 statement shows they have 8.2 million shares outstanding with a float of 2 million shares and 32 shareholders of record as of Jan 11, 2006. The number of shareholders dropped from 109 on Sept 30, 2005. 6.15 million shares were issued on Sept 9, 2005 in Oklahoma for the acquisition of the California subsidiary.
"Robert Berube/Quality Tax Consulting" of Diamond Bar, CA is the accountant who prepared the financial statements. No auditing or even reviewing.
The assets are mostly machinery which is only slightly depreciated. There's also current inventory, AR, and $12,550 in cash. The current ratio is less than 1 with current liabilities being mostly AP. Equity is about 30% of total assets.
Gross margins are less than 10%. Net margins are a bit less than half of that. Net income is $73K. Cash flow from ops is $267K thanks to a huge increase in AP partially offset by a gain of nearly all inventory. Capex was about $900K which was paid for mostly by issuing 300K shares of stock for $490K and $150K note payable [to Mr. Meer S. Ali, Mr. Munir H. Khan, and Farzana Begum, paying 7% interest for 18 months ending Nov 2006].
The notes claim they're a California corporation, not Oklahoma and established in 2002, not 2000. The 15c2-11 statement explains that the operating subsidiary is the California corp (which was acquired in Sept 2005).
They claim to be the first used textile equipment supplier in the US to maintain a direct office in Bangladesh. Also buyers in India and Pakistan. Equipment comes from US, Canada, Mexico, and Europe.
They plan to immediately establish a 100% export oriented textile manufacturing (weaving) plant in Bangladesh. They plan to set up a denim mfg plant and a composite knit plant. Warren Buffett couldn't make a profit in textiles and that was decades ago before it got really competitive.
6 full-time employees.
Competitors: Gibbs International LLC (Greer, SC), USA Atkins Machinery, Inc (Spartanburg, SC), USA Republic Textile Machinery Inc (Rock Hill, SC). All are privately held.
250 sq ft of office space (about 4 cubicles?) with an additional conference room for use on an as-needed basis ("Yeah, you guys can use our conference room when we're not using it, just schedule a time with Betty"). Heh. $1,500 per month lease. They have 800 sq ft of office space in Bangladesh for $500 per month.
Etc. etc. [there are more notes, nothing stands out particularly]
So the company earned a bit less than 1 cent in 9 months. Maybe they're worth 15 cents or so per share, but perhaps we should go ask Warren Buffett about buying textile mills.
A batch of raw sewage
VBAL (sec), a bank.
VCBC (sec), a bank.
VECG (no sec filings), a sugar company. Not sure which side of the sugar tariff they're on.
VCST (sec), video and audio communications over networks... yawn. Money loser.
VGPO (sec), hotel and restaurants. Money loser.
VIAI (sec), Paramount buying DreamWorks. This could be something great, I have no idea. Feel free to take advantage of it.
VISRF (sec), Yet Another Database Company. Money loser.
VMHVF (sec), Sell and rent DVDs over the Internet. Money loser.
VOII (sec), VOIP. I already looked at this, no? Huge money loser anyway.
APTD (sec), Yet another Internet stock market business. Horrible money loser.
APYM (sec), credit card transaction processing in China. Horrible money loser for now, but is in development stage.
ARME (sec), no operations.
UFBV (sec), management in search of something to manage. Horrible money loser.
UGTRF (sec), money loser.
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
Lithuania wants to keep a nuclear power plant open, postponing the closure until a replacement reactor is completed by 2013.
In the US, the TVA is looking to build 1 or 2 reactors around Northeast Alabama, with construction starting in 2011.
New Hampshire is looking into a second reactor at Seabrook. The first reactor's license was extended.
France is looking into creating a prototype 4th generation reactor, to begin operations in 2020 (link is broken).
Sunday, January 08, 2006
another pile of companies
Assets are almost entirely deferred tax asset. Also some capitalized SW costs and AR. Current ratio is slightly more than 1. Mostly equity.
Revenues increasing substantially. 46% gross margins. Lost money in 2005 due to $1 million increase in SG&A and increase in R&D. Huge income tax benefit causes a net income. Cash flow from ops is only $132K. Capex and capitalized SW costs are over $600K.
They've been doing better each year with operating cash flow (but still negative). They've been issuing common and preferred stock to deal with the shortfall.
Q2: Current ratio improves. More PP&E. More AR. Revenues still climbing. Expenses still climbing. $438K operating income for 6 months. Gigantic tax benefit again. I'd assume a normal net income of about $333K. 32 million shares. 8.3 million options and warrants. 40.3 million fully diluted shares. About 1.1 cents really earned in 6 months.
Free cash flow is negative due to AR and capex and capitalized SW development.
I have no idea what this company is worth. I'll bet the market thinks it's worth a lot. I'd say something like 20 cents, maybe. The stock is selling for 72 cents.
worth following (maybe the market will get disillusioned)
AMNF (sec), upscale frozen and refrigerated foods: pesto, sauces, pasta, focaccia, etc. Serial acquirer. CEO owns 12%.
Assets are securities, AR, PP&E, and inventory. Current ratio is very good. Mostly equity. 31% gross margins. 2.5% operating margins. $315K net profit which matches free cash flow closely. 13 million shares, 580K options. 13.6 million fully diluted shares. 2.3 cents per fully diluted share earned. Probably worth about 35 cents. Stock sells for 55 cents.
ARTNB (sec), water utility in Delaware. 71,000 metered customers, 232,000 people (28% of the state). Main source is groundwater, but they also purchase surface water via interconnections (18%).
Revenues have increased steadily each year, so has operating income.
2004: $4.4 million ($1.08)
2003: $3.9 million (96 cents)
2002: $4.2 million ($1.14)
2001: 3.3 million ($1.05)
2000: 2.5 million (78 cents)
The stock is probably worth $18, maybe $20. It's selling for $31.
VBAC (sec), Veterinary pharm. Revenues have gone up every year since 2000. Net income has been all over the map. They've typically lost money.
VCAT (sec), Venture Catalyst. I already looked at this when I looked at Table Trac.
VCYA (sec), distressed asset handlers. Balance sheet is good, but it had to be restated (for the worse, of course). Revenues have been steady. Normally operating earnings are about $250K, but they took a $2.8 million loss on extinguishment of debt and ended up with a $2.6 million loss. HOWEVER, their interest expense kills them every year and they show net losses in the last 3 years.
This year, they've taken on a great deal of additional stuff (and debt). The current ratio dropped to less than 2 (it was huge). For 3 months they earned $225K. For 9 months they earned $484K. 16 million shares. 4 million warrants. Unknown number of options. Earned 1.1 cents diluted in Q3. But cash flow is horrifying. They burned $11 million, most due to buying up consumer receivables (isn't that an investment, not operations). It seems like earnings are going to be whatever they say due to provisions with no history.
VERA (sec), telecom expense optimization (doing this for 20 years). They work with Avaya, Cisco, EADS, Nortel, NEC, SBC, Sprint, and others. Revenues have declined slowly over the years while they've lost money in 4 out of the last 5 years (only 2003 was slightly profitable).
VFIN (sec), financial services for high net worth and institutional investors. Sherb is their auditor. Balance sheet is rock solid (cash is greater than all liabilities). 63% equity. $26 million in revenues (vs $24 million prior year). $9 million gross profit (vs $8 million). $1.5 million operating profit (vs $414K). Large gain on forgiveness of debt (which I'll throw out for figuring net income). Very low tax. Under normal conditions, they'd have about $1 million in net income vs about $225K. 40 million shares (has increased rapidly). 19 million options and warrants!!!! Assume 60 million fully diluted shares. This means about 1.67 cents earned in 2004 (almost nothing earned in 2003). Free cash flow matches my estimate of earnings.
Looking ahead to Q3: They lost money in 2005.
VHSL (sec), vet pharm. Balance sheet is weak (and was weak in prior year). 57% gross margins. Operational loss in 2004. Tiny operational gain in 2003. Also lost money in 2005.
VIIN (sec), Russian forestry. Cyprus subsidiary, which is a showstopper.
VKSC (sec), plastic casings for the processed meat industry (i.e. check the margins on this one). 20% gross margins. Went bankrupt. The numbers look like a comodity business without any low-cost leadership.
VLTA (sec), personal videophones (which I've long argued is only going to be useful for grandmas and for porno). Generally, I expect this functionality to get bundled into existing cellphones and not in some revolutionary product line. These guys have only lost money each year.
VSCE (sec), no operations.
VSTN (sec), commercial mortgage brokerage.
VSYS (sec), access control security products (intercom, emergency communications, elevator control, alarm, etc). Assets are mostly inventory, AR, cash, intangibles, and some equipment. Balance sheet is ok. About half equity. 57% gross margins (yeah, that's the stuff). But expenses increased more than revenues and they had an operating loss (vs income last year). Free cash flow was better, but still negative. Free cash flow was negative last year as well (even with profit). Stock options this year and borrowing last year covered the outflow.
Q3 2005: $105K net income for 9 months (half was in Q3). Free cash flow better, but still negative (large jump in AR). 16 million shares. 3.3 million options. Assume 20 million totally diluted shares. So we're looking at about 0.7 cent per totally diluted share and the company might be worth 10 cents. The stock is selling for 52 cents.
However, these people look honest.